We've often based our analyses on what we call immutable laws. Because most folks work inside their own little wheel, they rarely step outside it to see the larger wheel(s) of which their own little wheel is but a single cog.
        For years dreamers and philosophers have screamed at American to look outside our wheel, and while many are dead wrong, they are worth the looksee anyway, if only to pause and take in the grandeur of the bigger picture. E.g, just going to the trouble of disproving a popular doomsday theme (man-made global warming or climate change comes to mind) can be very illuminating. Mill wrote something along those lines, when he talked about error bumping into truth, making the truth all the stronger because, from time to time, it had to resist an opposite line. (Falsity is not a point of view, by the way. Sorry.)
        For instance, throughout the post-election period there have been all sorts of calls for the people to rise up and take back the Republic at the polling booth. But here, we've sounded the cautionary note that it probably can't be done. Do the math, we've said.
        Even as we know the coalition to hand the nation over to the forces of socialism (however defined) was helped with cheating, most of that cheating was "legal", and their numbers right now are superior to ours. We know this coalition and the type of government it is establishing, must, as a matter of natural law, fall within 40-60 years.  But that is not tomorrow. That is not before infinite damage is done the ideas upon which the Nation was founded.
        Those forces that created that new majority (we like to call them The Enemy here) are as much cultural as political, with a well established and logical (un-pretty) end, if allowed to persist for no more than 10-12 years. This isn't politics anymore. It is inevitability, once certain things are allowed to become cemented. Once cemented, immutable laws take over.
        The Enemy's demographic is still one of growth (e.g., children raised only by their mothers) while ours is a demographic of decline. Liberty isn't cool any longer. Neither is morality. Of course, we argue that these things are reversible...but we must attend to the things that reverse them, such as jumping in headfirst to resist the Pop Culture rather than run away from it. We can't win while shying away from the Enemy face-to-face...on his turf. The Pop Culture is the national street now, and not the little back alley we hide away in. The Pop Culture defines how we raise our children, and worse, how public schools plan to raise our children on our behalf. The Pop Culture is defined by that same fatherless family (almost 50%), and no, I'm not speaking of poor people of color. Selfish little boys raised by helicopter mothers, never allowed to cross the street alone until about age 12, and never, never out of Mom's sight without first, a beeper, then later a cell phone, yet raised in no particular moral tradition, are more than apt to just walk away from a marriage after a kid has been born, in many cases just for the sheer boredom and inconvenience of it all (inconvenience was after all, what drove the anti-war movement during Vietnam), but also because of the inhibiting aspect of parenthood on one's pursuance of the pleasures of play and toys they found just behind Mom's apron's strings those first 22 years. Girls are little better, but alas, they get stuck with the habitat issues, having to raise L'il Dick's Li'l Dick...or maybe Li'l Scarlett.
        This is the demographic that drives politics in America today, and is very close to being irreversible. In constitutional politics it is a game changer, for clearly, the Founders never imagined that the national religion would ever turn out to be craven Me-ism.
       While you chew on that; here's another immutable law about to be invoked:
       : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

       These numbers are nearly irrefutable.
       It may explain a lot of things that have been going on inside G8 countries for several years. It may explain GW Bush's policy on immigration at our southern border, finding it better to repopulate the US with olive-skinned Roman Catholics than Muslims, who, history shows, have not been proven to be munificent managers of non-Muslims once the shoe is on the other foot. If Europe falls to Islam, it will not be the Lebanese or Moroccan (we've always been pro-Umayyad, sort of) or the Malaysian strain that will assume power there.
       But unlike the doomsdayers, we do not think these warnings are immutable or irreversible...yet.
       How Europe will handle it will be in keeping with their tradition, which will be 1) to submit quietly, with only a whimper, the rich and powerful setting up "sovereign nations of one" in Fiji or New Zealand or Trinidad. (Many like-minded beta Americans will do likewise)....or 2) one day, in the not too distant future, we will wake to find that there had been a Kristallnacht in some remote Europe city, possibly the Netherlands, or Austria, or maybe Sweden. Once that cat is out of the bag, it will be difficult for inside-the-box Euro bureaucrats to put it back, and shortly Europe with revert to type. The continental pogrom will have begun...again.
       Thankfully, America is a few decades behind (ahead?) of the Euros, so either of these scenarios will play out before our eyes. It explains why Islamo-fascism is so intent on bringing America the Satan up to pace with the Euros, who they consider already "in the bag".
       If indeed this sort of information was part of GW's thinking in framing his immigration policy, then he should be damned to hell for yet one more crime of compassion...but not because he was wrong, but because, in the end, he felt we couldn't handle the truth, and withheld it from us.
       Yes, we can.
Vassar Bushmills